Raloxifene by Dragon Pharma

Dragon Pharma Original Formula

Raloxifene HCl

Evista60 mg/tab
Class 3rd-Gen SERM
Half-Life ~27 hours
Mechanism Selective ER Antagonist
Primary Use Gynecomastia Treatment
Pack 100 tabs
Form Oral Tablet
Availability: In Stock
$116.00
Quantity
Shipping
Wishlist

Raloxifene Hydrochloride — Evista by Dragon Pharma

Raloxifene is Dragon Pharma's formulation of Raloxifene Hydrochloride at 60mg per tablet — a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) FDA-approved for osteoporosis treatment and breast cancer risk reduction, and increasingly used in bodybuilding specifically for the treatment of existing gynecomastia where Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) has shown inferior results in direct comparative studies.

Also searched as: Raloxifene 60mg, Evista tabs, Raloxifene gynecomastia, Raloxifene Dragon Pharma.

What Is Raloxifene — Third-Generation SERM

SERMs are classified by generation based on their tissue selectivity and clinical development timeline:

  • First generation: Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) — broad estrogen receptor antagonism with partial agonist activity in some tissues
  • Second generation: Toremifene — similar to Tamoxifen with some structural differences
  • Third generation: Raloxifene — designed with improved tissue selectivity; antagonist in breast tissue and uterus, agonist in bone; different co-activator recruitment profile than earlier SERMs

The generational advance is clinically significant: Raloxifene's improved receptor binding profile and tissue selectivity translate to a different pattern of agonist/antagonist effects across tissues, which explains both its superior efficacy for existing gynecomastia and its different (generally less favourable) profile for testosterone recovery vs Tamoxifen.

Why Raloxifene Is Superior to Nolvadex for Treating Existing Gynecomastia

This is the most important and most poorly-explained distinction in all competitor content on these two SERMs:

  • A direct comparative study (Lawrence et al., 2004, published in Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism) randomised adolescent males with persistent pubertal gynecomastia to either Tamoxifen 10-20mg/day or Raloxifene 60mg/day for 3-9 months
  • Results: Raloxifene group achieved 86% reduction in breast tissue volume vs 41% reduction in the Tamoxifen group — a statistically significant difference showing Raloxifene is approximately twice as effective for existing breast tissue reduction
  • A subsequent study (Plourde et al., 2004, also JCEM) confirmed Raloxifene's superiority for gynecomastia tissue reduction vs Tamoxifen
  • The mechanistic reason: Raloxifene's binding profile at the estrogen receptor in breast tissue differs from Tamoxifen — specifically, Raloxifene lacks the partial agonist activity that Tamoxifen retains at breast tissue estrogen receptors. In existing gynecomastia where breast tissue has already been stimulated by estrogen, partial agonism from Tamoxifen can provide ongoing low-level stimulation alongside its antagonism. Raloxifene's purer antagonism at breast ER produces more complete blockade

Raloxifene vs Nolvadex vs Clomid — The Three-Way SERM Comparison

Parameter Raloxifene (60mg) Nolvadex (Tamoxifen) Clomid (Clomiphene)
Gynecomastia treatment Superior — 86% reduction in trials Moderate — 41% reduction in same trials Not indicated
Gynecomastia prevention Effective Standard choice Some effect via estrogen receptor
LH/FSH stimulation for PCT Minimal — weak hypothalamic activity Moderate — some pituitary LH stimulation Strong — primary PCT SERM
Breast tissue ER antagonism Strongest — pure antagonist Moderate — partial agonist activity present Mixed — not breast-tissue specific
Bone density Positive — agonist in bone (FDA approved for osteoporosis) Neutral in men Neutral
Visual side effects Rare Possible Common — Zuclomiphene component
Half-life ~27 hours ~5–7 days Mixed: ~10h + ~30 days

When to Use Raloxifene vs Nolvadex

The clinical evidence points to specific use cases for each:

  • Use Raloxifene when: existing gynecomastia is present and needs to be reduced; when Nolvadex has been tried and been insufficient; when pursuing the most evidence-backed treatment for established breast tissue development
  • Use Nolvadex when: preventing gynecomastia on cycle (where pure antagonism advantage of Raloxifene is less critical); during PCT where the LH/FSH stimulation from Tamoxifen is useful alongside Clomid; when managing estrogen receptor activity during and after a cycle broadly
  • Both can be combined — some users run Raloxifene for gynecomastia reduction while using Nolvadex + Clomid for PCT hormonal recovery

Effects and Benefits

  • Superior reduction of existing gynecomastia breast tissue — 86% reduction vs 41% for Tamoxifen in direct comparative studies
  • Effective prevention of new gynecomastia development during cycles
  • Bone density support — agonist activity in bone provides the same bone-protective effect as estrogen without estrogenic side effects in other tissues
  • No suppression of natural testosterone — stimulates neither significantly nor detrimentally the HPG axis
  • FDA-approved drug with extensive safety data from osteoporosis and breast cancer risk reduction indications

Dosage and Administration

Use Case Dose Duration
Existing gynecomastia treatment 60 mg/day (1 tab) 3–6 months for established tissue
On-cycle gynecomastia prevention 60 mg/day Duration of cycle
Combined with PCT SERMs 60 mg/day Raloxifene + Clomid/Nolvadex Duration of PCT

Raloxifene's ~27-hour half-life makes once-daily dosing straightforward. The 60mg tablet is the standard dose used in all major clinical trials — no splitting required. Duration for treating established gynecomastia is longer than for prevention — studies ran 3-9 months to achieve the documented 86% breast tissue reduction.

Side Effects

  • Hot flashes — most commonly reported; caused by estrogen receptor antagonism in the hypothalamus; typically mild and transient
  • Venous thromboembolism risk — a class effect shared with all SERMs; individuals with VTE history or risk factors should approach with caution
  • Leg cramps — reported in a subset of users, particularly at initiation
  • Does not significantly stimulate LH or FSH — Raloxifene is not a substitute for PCT; it does not drive testosterone recovery and should be combined with Clomid or Nolvadex if HPG recovery is needed alongside gynecomastia treatment

Raloxifene in an AAS Context

  • For existing gynecomastia from a cycle: Raloxifene 60mg/day as the primary treatment
  • For PCT hormonal recovery alongside gynecomastia treatment: add Clomid or Nolvadex — Raloxifene does not replace SERM-based PCT
  • For on-cycle estrogen management: pair with Arimidex or Aromasin for source-level estrogen control alongside Raloxifene's receptor-level protection

"Raloxifene is formulated at the standard 60mg clinical dose — the same dose used in the trials demonstrating 86% gynecomastia reduction vs 41% for Tamoxifen. For existing breast tissue development, the comparative evidence consistently favours Raloxifene."

Storage and Handling

Store Raloxifene at room temperature, away from direct sunlight and moisture. Keep the original packaging sealed until use to maintain tablet potency.

Please log in to write review.

A direct comparative trial (Lawrence et al., 2004, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism) demonstrated 86% reduction in breast tissue volume with Raloxifene 60mg/day versus 41% reduction with Tamoxifen — approximately twice as effective. The mechanistic reason is that Tamoxifen retains partial estrogen agonist activity at breast tissue receptors, providing ongoing low-level stimulation alongside its antagonism. Raloxifene is a purer antagonist at breast ER, producing more complete blockade of existing tissue.

No — Raloxifene has minimal hypothalamic activity and does not meaningfully stimulate LH or FSH. It is not a substitute for Clomid or Nolvadex in a PCT protocol. Users needing both gynecomastia treatment and hormonal recovery should run Raloxifene alongside Clomid or Nolvadex rather than using Raloxifene alone.

Both are SERMs but from different generations. Nolvadex (Tamoxifen) is first-generation with partial estrogen agonist activity in some tissues. Raloxifene is third-generation with improved tissue selectivity — pure antagonist in breast tissue (better for gynecomastia), agonist in bone (beneficial for density), weaker hypothalamic activity (less useful for testosterone recovery). Each has distinct strengths depending on the application.

Clinical trials ran 3-9 months to achieve the documented 86% breast tissue reduction. Established gynecomastia (fibrous tissue that has been present for months or years) takes significantly longer to treat than early-onset puffy nipples — and may not fully resolve regardless of SERM treatment if the tissue has become predominantly fibrotic.

Yes — its estrogen receptor antagonism at breast tissue is effective for prevention as well as treatment. However, for on-cycle prevention where pure receptor antagonism is required, Nolvadex's additional LH-stimulating properties may be relevant during PCT, and Raloxifene's lack of PCT utility makes it more specifically useful for treatment of existing tissue.

Yes — Raloxifene is FDA-approved for osteoporosis prevention and treatment specifically because it is an estrogen receptor agonist in bone tissue. This provides bone-protective effects similar to estrogen without estrogenic side effects in other tissues — a potential secondary benefit for AAS users where bone metabolism may be affected by the hormonal environment.

Related Products